Outcomes during and after long-term tocilizumab treatment in patients with giant cell arteritis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients during and after long-term tocilizumab (TCZ) treatment. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of GCA patients treated with TCZ at a single centre (2010-2022). Time to relapse and annualised relapse rate during and after TCZ treatment, prednisone use, and safety were assessed. Relapse was defined as reappearance of any GCA clinical manifestation that required treatment intensification, regardless of C reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. RESULTS: Sixty-five GCA patients were followed for a mean (SD) of 3.1 (1.6) years. The mean duration of the initial TCZ course was 1.9 (1.1) years. The Kaplan-Meier (KM)-estimated relapse rate at 18 months on TCZ was 15.5%. The first TCZ course was discontinued due to satisfactory remission achievement in 45 (69.2%) patients and adverse events in 6 (9.2%) patients. KM-estimated relapse rate at 18 months after TCZ discontinuation was 47.3%. Compared with patients stopping TCZ at or before 12 months of treatment, the multivariable adjusted HR (95% CI) for relapse in patients on TCZ beyond 12 months was 0.01 (0.00 to 0.28; p=0.005). Thirteen patients received >1 TCZ course. Multivariable adjusted annualised relapse rates (95% CI) in all periods on and off TCZ aggregated were 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) and 0.4 (0.3 to 0.7), respectively (p=0.0004). Prednisone was discontinued in 76.9% of patients. During the study, 13 serious adverse events occurred in 11 (16.9%) patients. CONCLUSION: Long-term TCZ treatment was associated with remission maintenance in most patients with GCA. The estimated relapse rate by 18 months after TCZ discontinuation was 47.3%.

Mass Switch From Intravenous to Subcutaneous Tocilizumab in Rheumatic Diseases During the SARS-COV-2 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: With the arrival of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in 2020, it was proposed to make the change from intravenous (IV) tocilizumab (TCZ) to its subcutaneous formulation, in order to avoid rheumatological patients having to go to the day hospital and guarantee enough IV TCZ for those critical patients with COVID who needed it. The aim of this study was to describe the rate and reasons for switching back to IV TCZ from subcutaneous TCZ. METHODS: We included patients from the rheumatology service that were on treatment with IV TCZ in February 2020 and were followed up until March 2021. Patients that remained on subcutaneous TCZ were compared with those who switched back to IV TCZ (switch-back group). A subgroup analysis according to rheumatic disease was performed. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients switched to subcutaneous TCZ: 28 rheumatoid arthritis, 19 giant cell arteritis, 4 polymyalgia rheumatica, 2 juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and 2 systemic sclerosis. Seventeen patients switched back to IV TCZ due to ineffectiveness (n = 8), patient preference (n = 4), adverse events (n = 4), and difficulty with the SC administration route (n = 1). In the analysis by disease, 4 of 23 patients switched back to IV TCZ in giant cell arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatica group due to ineffectiveness (n = 2), injection site reaction (n = 1), or patient preference (n = 1). In rheumatoid arthritis group, 11 of 28 patients switched back to IV TCZ: ineffectiveness (n = 5), patient preference (n = 3), headache (n = 1), injection site reaction (n = 1), and due to difficulty with the SC administration route (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Mass switch from IV to subcutaneous TCZ during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been safe, effective, and well tolerated after 1 year of follow-up.

Giant cell arteritis with spontaneous remission.

The case of a 75-year-old woman diagnosed with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), treated with low doses of prednisone, and with clinical and analytical remission is reported. Two years later, she presented with a clinical picture of giant cell arteritis (GCA), including headache, diplopia, jaw pain, feeling of swelling in both temples, and elevation of acute phase reactants. Symptoms spontaneously subsided 2 weeks later, while analytical parameters improved without any treatment. A high-resolution colour Doppler ultrasound showed thickening of the intima-media complex with 'halo' sign in the right temporal artery. A biopsy of the right temporal artery was performed, although it was not successful, as no artery could be found, and the procedure became more complicated with an eyebrow ptosis due to a lesion in the frontal branch of the facial nerve. GCA diagnosis was based on the clinical, laboratory, and ultrasound findings. The patient was treated with prednisone and methotrexate, without clinical or analytical relapse. Comments are presented on the described cases of GCA with spontaneous remission, and the most appropriate treatments in these cases are discussed. Other peculiarities of the case, such as the progression to GCA more than 2 years after the onset of PMR, and the complications from the temporal artery biopsy are also mentioned.

COVID-19 among patients with giant cell arteritis: a single-centre observational study from Slovenia.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA) represent a fragile population with an increased infection risk. In a recent study, older age, a higher number of comorbidities, higher disease activity and prednisolone ≥ 10 mg/day were associated with worse COVID-19 outcome. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and severity of COVID-19 in a well-defined GCA cohort. METHODS: We reviewed medical records of histologically and/or by imaging-proven GCA patients diagnosed between September 2011 and February 2020 at our secondary/tertiary centre and followed during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and February 2022 (24 months). Descriptive statistics were used to explore the studied population. RESULTS: Of 314 patients with GCA diagnosed for the first time during a 102-month period, 49 patients died before March 2020. Of the remaining 265 patients, 55 (20.8%) patients suffered from a total of 57 SARS-CoV-2 infections. We observed 44 (77.2%) mild and 13 (22.8%) severe COVID-19 episodes (the latter defined as needing hospitalization, death or thrombotic complication). Patients with severe COVID-19 were more likely to have arterial hypertension (12 [92.3%] vs. 25 [56.8%]; p = 0.022), cardiovascular disease (7 [53.8%] vs. 10 [22.7%]; p = 0.043) or obesity (5 [38.5%] vs. 5 [11.4%]; p = 0.038). Neither prednisolone dose 1-5 mg/day (p = 0.483) nor leflunomide use (p = 1.000) was associated with COVID-19 course. There were no significant differences in sex, age, GCA type, GCA disease duration and other comorbidities in patients with mild and severe COVID-19 in our cohort. CONCLUSION: More than a fifth of our GCA patients had severe COVID-19. Treatment with leflunomide or low doses of glucocorticoids were not associated with severe course in our cohort. Key Points • Treatment with leflunomide or low doses of glucocorticoids were not associated with worse COVID-19 outcome. • Outcomes of COVID-19 improved as the COVID-19 pandemic, prevention and treatment options evolved. • Arterial hypertension, cardiovascular disease or obesity were associated with severe COVID-19.

Treatment of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis-Current and Future.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Guidelines for the management of large vessel vasculitides have been recently updated by several scientific societies. We have evaluated the current recommendations for treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TA) and addressed potential future therapeutic strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: While glucocorticoids (GCs) remain the gold standard for induction of remission, many patients relapse and acquire high cumulative GC exposure. Thus, GC-sparing therapies such as methotrexate are recommended for selected patients with GCA and all patients with TA. Recent high-quality evidence shows that tocilizumab is an effective GC-sparing agent in GCA. Non-biologic and biologic immunomodulators also appear to have GC-sparing properties in TA. Tocilizumab is now considered to be part of the standard treatment for GCA, particularly with relapsing disease, but questions on its use such as length of treatment and monitoring of disease activity remain open. High-quality evidence to guide treatment of TA is still lacking.

Considerations for the Treatment of Inflammatory Neuro-Ophthalmologic Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The initiation and continuation of immune-based therapies to treat and prevent complications of inflammatory neuro-ophthalmologic disorders during the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is the subject of considerable debate. In each case, a treatment decision must be reached based on best clinical practices for the disorder, patient comorbidities, the current state of knowledge about the pathogenesis and infectivity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the utilization of hospital and community resources. Unfortunately, the evidence needed to standardize the decision-making process for each neuro-ophthalmologic disorder is currently absent and is likely to require months or years to develop based on the accrual of robust international data sets. In this article, we review the current understanding of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 complications to provide a framework for approaching the treatment of inflammatory neuro-ophthalmic disorders during the COVID-19 viral pandemic.